Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection - Concord White Paper

How proactive monitoring improves data confidence, reduces risk, and accelerates issue resolution.

WHITE PAPER

Capturing Value Anomaly Detection with

How Proactive Monitoring Improves Data Confidence, Reduces Risk, and Accelerates Issue Resolution

In data-driven organizations,

issues often go unnoticed until they escalate—

impacting reporting accuracy, decision-making,

and customer experiences. One-time validations

or ad hoc checks aren’t enough to catch every

problem. Anomaly detection offers a proactive

solution. By enabling real-time visibility into data

quality and system performance, organizations

can catch issues earlier, respond quickly, and

improve overall confidence in data reliability.

At Concord, we help clients implement scalable

anomaly detection strategies that reduce

downtime, increase operational efficiency, and

strengthen confidence in core processes. This

white paper outlines the mechanics behind

anomaly detection, how it delivers business value,

and real-world success stories from our clients.

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

1

Catch More Incidents, Reduce Manual Monitoring

Traditional checks miss issues that emerge gradually or

indicate pattern changes. Anomaly detection flags these

subtle changes—like data drift or unexpected pipeline

behavior—before they become serious problems, while

reducing the need for constant manual review.

Why Anomaly Detection?

Accelerate Time to Resolution

By pinpointing when and where anomalies begin,

anomaly detection minimizes diagnostic time. This

enables teams to shift from reactive troubleshooting to

proactive issue resolution.

Increase Confidence in Data and System Performance

Reliable data underpins everything from marketing

performance to operational decisions. Monitoring for

anomalies safeguards your most critical pipelines,

ensuring trustworthy insights and system health.

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

2

What Makes a Solution “Anomaly Detection”?

1.) Continuous Monitoring at the Right Cadence

Monitoring intervals should match how frequently your data updates and how fast you need to act on issues.

For example:

Daily: Validate batch pipeline outputs and segment consistency

Hourly: Track business performance metrics or campaign trends

Every 5 minutes: Detect outages, fraud, or critical system anomalies.

2.) Defined Thresholds for Identifying Anomalies

Thresholds can be static (e.g., business-defined rules) or dynamic (e.g., based on historical or learned behavior).

Regardless of the method, thresholds must follow explainable logic to ensure trust and actionability.

3.) Automated Alerts and Escalation Paths

Detection means little without action. Alerting mechanisms should feed directly into operations—whether via instant

message, email, or incident workflows—so issues are addressed in real time.

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

3

Approaches to Anomaly Detection

Below is a breakdown of widely used anomaly detection

methods, including their data requirements, complexity,

Visual Inspection

and ideal applications.

Visual inspection remains one of the simplest and

quickest approaches, often used for exploratory

analysis. While it offers limited capacity for complex

problem solving, it’s useful for identifying obvious

anomalies in raw counts or basic time series data.

Type:

Unsupervised / Supervised

Complexity:

Low

typical use cases:

Basic dashboard reviews, investigating reported

issues, informal campaign tracking, spot checks

during routine analysis

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

4

anomaly detection methods

Statistical Time Series (e.g., ARIMA, SARIMAX)

Clustering Methods (e.g., DBSCAN)

Statistical time series models are grounded in proven,

Clustering techniques identify patterns by grouping

scientific methods and are often used to forecast trends

data based on similarity. These methods can effectively

and detect deviations. These models are relatively easy

flag outliers by defining what’s "normal." While they offer

to implement and interpret but may struggle with

valuable insights, costs can increase with data volume

irregular processes or multivariate relationships.

and complexity.

Type:

Type:

Unsupervised / Supervised

Unsupervised

Complexity:

Complexity:

Medium

Medium – High

typical use cases:

typical use cases:

Identifying out-of-plan behavior, spotting counter-

Detecting unusual data combinations, identifying

seasonal trends, uncovering marketing opportunities,

suspicious behavior, finding unique selling points,

measuring trend-based metrics over time

understanding natural groupings in data

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

5

anomaly detection methods

Traditional Machine Learning Classifiers (e.g., Random Forests)

Neural Networks & Deep Learning (e.g., LSTM)

Deep learning models offer unmatched flexibility and

Machine learning classifiers offer scalable, automated

power for detecting complex, non-linear anomalies—

solutions for anomaly detection, especially in

especially in high-frequency or multivariate data.

structured, well-defined environments. These models

However, they require significant training data,

deliver reliable performance with variable costs

computational resources, and ongoing monitoring to

depending on data preparation and infrastructure.

remain effective.

Type:

Type:

Supervised

Supervised / Unsupervised

Complexity:

Complexity:

High

Very High

typical use cases:

typical use cases:

Fraud detection, segment-level outlier classification,

High-frequency anomaly detection, multivariate time-

automated anomaly scoring in production systems

series forecasting, modeling nonlinear or contextual

patterns, adaptive anomaly systems in dynamic

environments

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

6

Types of Anomaly Detection Problems

TYPE

WHEN TO USE

DETECTION METHOD

EXAMPLE USE CASES

When anomalies are known or well-defined

Labeled inputs, often based on business logic

Fraud detection, bot activity, likely buyer identification

Supervised

Unsupervised- Univariate

Monitoring a single key metric over time

Detects values outside expected range

Transaction volume spikes, unique visitors per minute, unusually high attribute counts Downtime across systems, suspicious behavior based on multiple features, market trends

Use case success depends

on correctly aligning the

Identifies deviations from normal patterns

Unsupervised- Multivariate

Detecting unusual combinations of data points

detection type with your

data context.

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

7

Key Business Considerations

Selecting the right anomaly detection approach requires more than just technical evaluation. Organizations must weigh

factors like speed, cost, and tolerance for error to ensure their monitoring strategy aligns with business goals.

Speed of Detection: How quickly do we need to be alerted?

E X AMPLE US E CA S E S

ALERT TIMING

M onitor data pipeline health, validate audience segment counts

Daily

The urgency of detection directly influences the complexity

and cost of your monitoring solution. As the demand for

Track top-line metrics, identify emerging trends

Hour ly

real-time insights increases, so does the need for more

W i th i n 5 m i nutes

Detect system downtime, flag potential fraud

advanced—and often less accessible—tools and infrastructure.

Return on Investment (ROI): What’s the tradeoff between cost, effort, and benefit?

The right anomaly detection strategy can yield substantial

Saves time otherwise spent manually identifying anomalie s

returns by improving efficiency, reducing risk, and enabling

R educes exposure to costly risks like fraud or lost revenu e

faster response times. Efficient monitoring isn’t just about

Enables faster, more informed responses to performance issues

saving time, it’s about protecting revenue and reputation.

Error Tolerance: What’s the cost of missing or misidentifying an anomaly?

ERROR TYPE

POTENTIAL IMPACT

M inor user friction, unnecessary course corrections

F al se Pos i t i ve (Type 1)

Different use cases have different risk profiles. Knowing what

kinds of errors are acceptable—or unacceptable—can guide

F al se Neg a t i ve (Type 2)

P otential data breaches, customer churn, lost revenue, or missed opportunities

the design of your detection approach.

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

8

Data Quality Monitoring Concord in Action:

CLIENT:

Financial Services

Challenge:

Persistent data discrepancies between the customer data platform (CDP) and experimentation systems created confusion, with no clear path to diagnose the source of errors.

Approach:

Implemented rules-based univariate monitoring with daily automated alerts to track key metrics and highlight inconsistencies.

outcome:

The introduction of a daily dashboard enabled timely detection and resolution of data parity issues, restoring confidence in data integrity and accelerating troubleshooting.

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

9

Top-Line Metric Monitoring Concord in Action:

CLIENT:

Financial Services

Challenge:

Analysts spent over 40 combined hours weekly performing manual checks on top-line performance metrics, detracting from strategic analysis.

Approach:

Deployed hourly statistical time series models to compare current performance against historical trends, automating anomaly detection and flagging deviations in near real time. Because missing a real drop in performance could be far more costly than chasing a false alarm, the system was designed to prioritize sensitivity and catch issues early.

outcome:

Monitoring effort was reduced by 75%, enabling more frequent and timely detection while allowing analysts to focus on high- value activities with clear, actionable alerts.

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

10

Rapid Anomaly Alerting Concord in Action:

CLIENT:

Financial Services

Challenge:

Manual alert escalation processes delayed issue response by over an hour, increasing the risk of customer impact and attrition.

Approach:

Developed and deployed an LSTM-based forecasting model for anomaly detection at five-minute intervals, integrated with Slack for immediate alerting and escalation. In this high-stakes environment, speed mattered more than perfection—so the model favored quick detection, even if it meant surfacing new false positives.

outcome:

Monitoring effort was reduced by 75%, enabling more frequent and timely detection while allowing analysts to focus on high-value activities with clear, actionable alerts.

Reduced response times by 92%

Successfully detected all 3 critical incidents in a blind test

Identified over 10 minor incidents previously missed by manual monitoring

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

11

Anomaly Detection is a Competitive Advantage

Monitoring is not just about ensuring uptime. It is about building trust in your data, reducing time spent on manual

diagnostics, and enabling teams to opportunities with speed and confidence. At Concord, we work with organizations to

implement scalable anomaly detection strategies that combine proven statistical techniques with advanced machine

learning—tailored to your business goals and data environment.

Whether you are focused on improving data quality, protecting critical systems, or identifying issues before they impact

operations or customers, our experts can help you design and execute the right solution.

Let’s Connect

Looking to stay ahead of data issues before they become business risks?

Reach out to learn how Concord can help you build a strong and proactive anomaly detection strategy.

Contact Us

Concord | concordusa.com

952-241-1090

info@concordusa.com

Capturing Value with Anomaly Detection

12

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13

www.concordusa.com

Powered by